New ruling says Samsung infringed on Apple autocomplete patent

Editorial Note: Talk Android may contain affiliate links on some articles. If you make a purchase through these links, we will earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Apple-vs-Samsung

With a new patent trial scheduled to start on March 31, 2014 between Apple and Samsung, Judge Lucy Koh has entered a summary judgment order on some motions from the two parties. Judge Koh denied some requests from Apple, but did rule that Samsung infringed an Apple patent on “word recommendations” aka autocomplete. At this point, Samsung will now have to argue at trial that the patent itself should be ruled invalid. Considering the ubiquity of autocomplete on any smartphone, this ruling could be a problem for manufacturers of other Android devices. Reportedly, Google is involved with an anonymous reexamination request of the patent. As the parties prepare for trial, Apple still has five patents at issue with one of them ruled as being infringed upon by Samsung even before the jury starts to hear the case.

Meanwhile, Samsung also had five patents that it was claiming Apple infringed upon. One of these patents involved multimedia synchronization methods across devices. Judge Koh ruled in this latest order that the patent was invalid as argued by Apple, who pointed to an earlier filed patent for a similar method. Samsung appears to have acquired this particular patent for the sole purpose of being able to assert infringement against Apple, a strategy that has now failed with Judge Koh's ruling. Going into trial, Samsung is down to only four patents to be considered by the jury.

Between now and the start of the trial, the CEOs of the companies are slated to meet for settlement talks. This latest ruling is expected to give Apple significant leverage in those talks

source: FOSS Patents

Total
0
Shares
4 comments
  1. Auto complete or word suggest has been around long before mobile phones became ubiquitous. I remember using AltaVista circa 1998 and it did it then.

  2. Samsung should refuse to sell screens to Apple and force them to put yellow spotted LG screens on their devices. What am I talking about? Do a search over at macrumors forums and read about the uproar by the folks who got iPads and iPhones with LG screens that had huge yellow spots on them. This forced Apple to order a bunch of screens from Samsung who should use this to their advantage in settlement talks.

    1. I have an LG OGP and the screen is perfect and that’s generally true with LG devices . . . maybe LG just gave apple their seconds?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post

Being the Un-carrier isn’t enough for T-Mobile, looking to become the Un-bank with ‘Mobile Money’

Next Post

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 with KitKat not working with third-party accessories, root fix now available