Latest Android news, applications and forum discussion

Jul

30

2011

Google Acquires More Than 1,000 Patents From IBM As The Patent Wars Continue

by Andrew Greenfield
tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

There seems to be more news in the smartphone industry about patents and lawsuits than there is about phones now a days. Companies are putting up their barricades in an attempt to prevent the patent trolls to come knocking. Despite Google’s public stance against the practice of buying companies to attack others, it appears as if the company has realized that in order to survive in the technology world it will have to spend a lot of money in acquiring patents as well. Hopefully Google stays true to its word and uses the IP as a defense-only device and/or for innovated reason rather than trying to win cheap lawsuits against smaller companies. So what now? Boy, when Google wants to do something it gets it done.

For those of you who aren’t aware, I’m not a big fan of Apple’s patent trolling new ways. Google doesn’t seem to be either. In an attempt to prevent Google from buying Nortel’s 6,000 something size IP portfolio, Apple, Microsoft and a few others ganged up in polling together to outbid Google. Google’s own Kent Walker lashed out after the Nortel bid about the sudden rise patent trolling.

“We buy companies all the time—for both people and interesting technologies. This would have been north of $4 billion for none of those things. We were bidding on the right to stop people from innovating,”

While I don’t necessarily think that patents prevent innovation (in theory, they should aid them), I do find the current patent system horribly flawed. I’m not qualified to say what should be done to fix it, but the current “buy the small companies to sue the big” is having a series negative impact on innovation. Do you have any idea how hard it is for a small company to enter into software now a days? There are so many general patents that they have to try and step around in hopes that a larger company won’t try to sue them for what they did invent on their own. It’s like trying to teach yourself a sport on minefield and expecting to be able to compete with professionals. Regardless of what your opinions are on the patent system, the patent wars are in full swing.

After failing to acquire Nortel, Google did no sit tidily licking their wounds. According to pcmag, Google has secured 1,030 patents from IBM. They offered a few of them for the world to see and they appear to be mostly search engine and software patents. Nice things to have when that’s the meat of your business. There are a few other patents that have a few people wondering whether or not that Google might be looking to do some new things as well (innovation. Crazy, right?). This nearly doubles the search giant’s tiny IP portfolio. This of course comes right after the announcement that Google was also looking to acquire patents from InterDigital. Google doesn’t like watching its OS be picked apart by Apple, and they seem to be readying the troops to defend against an all out attack.

Between all of this and the Oracle lawsuit, you have to wonder whether or not Google knew what it was getting into when it decided to enter the mobile world.

» See more articles by Andrew Greenfield

Categorized as Android News, Unique

Comments

  • AdamVM

    I do not believe your alone in your disdain for the sudden barage of patent suits against Android by Apple and Microsoft. I think we all understand why we have patents. I think what leaves a bad taste in our mouths is the timing. It sure seems to me that when Android was new and not selling that well yet, neither company seemed to care what patents were being violated. Now that Android devices are selling like crazy and dominating the smartphone market, suddenly the violations matter. The lawsuits just scream, “We can’t beat you, so we’ll sue you to slow you up or shut you down.” Apple and Microsoft are both partly responsible for Androids success. Not because of the technology in it, but for their own choices. Apple chose to keep their phone on one Carrier for years before allowing a second to sell it. So naturally that limited it’s success against a product that was available on every carrier. Microsoft let their smartphone OS fall by the wayside, and then after their marketshare is so low, THEN they put out a new one, which is going no where fast. So with the lack of having an inovative product out, they also propelled Android forward. So yes the lawsuits seem to many of us to be nothing but sour grapes because Android threatens iPhone and keeps WP7 from gaining ground. And in my case it lowers my respect for both companies.

  • Hood Hussein

    When two big cats fight each other over a killed impala, the waiting wolves get the advantage.

  • alex

    Hopefully Google sues Apple now

  • http://3GonTravel.com Frank

    @AdamVM : Each of your mentioned companies (Apple, Google, Microsoft) wants to maximize their marketshare. Non of those will play “nice” and will use whatever they have to use as a lever to get the best result. There are no friends among competitors, and if there would be we as customers will NOT benefit as things like price-/market-fixing could arise. It would limit competition and/or choice.
    I regard current environment of mobile OS as not that bad. Customers have sufficient choices and all companies hold IP to battle. The amount of choices is good:
    - Android; all carriers, multiple hardware suppliers, very open structure on apps
    - BlackBerry; all carriers, mainly 1 hardware supplier, controlled structure
    - iOS; limited carriers, 1 hardware supplier, controlled structure
    - Microsoft; all carriers, multiple hardware suppliers, open structure on apps
    When looking to my own choices and evolution over time, I would have gone to Android about 7 years ago and more, as the freedom appeals to me (at that time I was mainly on Linux). About 7 years ago I saw this perceived freedom as less important, and my needs were evolving to more quality of products, good user experience, and “it simply works always” need. That has moved me towards the Apple side.
    I do not share your vision that this lawsuit screams “We can’t beat you, so we will sue you to slow you down or shut you down”. The legal battle is at the level of companies, and does not change/influence consumer behavior. At company level patent legal cases take resources at the Legal Department and only limited resources in Development. So new developments and innovation do not get hurt. On top NO company will allow to maneuver itself into a position to stop deliveries; things will be settled before that situation occurs. If you think different then please share an example (except copy cat examples).

    @Hood : and when the 2 big cats settle and reach agreement, the waiting wolves starve. Who are the waiting wolves btw; Microsoft and RIM?

    @alex : they will in order to leverage and settle/reach agreement.