[Breaking] Apple is victorious in getting Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 banned in Germany

by Robert Nazarian on
tagged , , , , , , ,

Back in August, A Dusseldorf issued a preliminary injunction on the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1. It was originally for all of Europe (minus the Netherlands), but later changed to just Germany.

Today, the same court upheld that injunction which means the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 is banned from any sales in the country. Presiding Judge Johanna Brueckner-Hofmann said the following when delivering the verdict:

“The court is of the opinion that Apple’s minimalistic design isn’t the only technical solution to make a tablet computer, other designs are possible. For the informed customer there remains the predominant overall impression that the device looks like the design Apple has protected in Europe.”

The judge said the court didn’t compare the Galaxy Tab 10.1 with the actual iPad, but instead focused on a design Apple filed with the European Union intellectual property agency in Spain.

» Read the rest

Microsoft inks licensing deals with Acer and Viewsonic over Android violations

by Robert Nazarian on
tagged , , , , , ,

A few months ago, Microsoft was able to cut a deal with HTC grabbing $5 per device sold. We know Microsoft can’t make any money selling their own devices so they figured they would steal it from others. It’s kind of like taxing the rich and giving it to the poor. Microsoft is far from poor, but their sales of Windows phone is.

Microsoft just announced they now have licensing deals in place with Acer and Viewsonic. We do not know the terms, but much like the HTC deal, it will continue the trend that Microsoft will earn more money through licensing deals than sales of their own devices.

The major quote in both press releases is the following:

“We are pleased that [Acer/Viewsonic] is taking advantage of our industrywide licensing program established to help companies address Android’s IP issues,” said Horacio Gutierrez, corporate vice president and deputy general counsel of Intellectual Property and Licensing at Microsoft. “This agreement is an example of how industry leaders can reach commercially reasonable arrangements that address intellectual property.”

We can expect that as part of these deals, and future deals, that manufacturers will be forced to produce Windows devices. This is why Google bought Motorola. They needed to get control of the manufacturing process because it is unknown how any of these lawsuits will end.

[via androidcentral]

Verizon wants President Obama to intervene in smartphone patent wars

by Robert Nazarian on
tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

There is no question the patent wars plaguing the smartphone and tablet industry is out of control. Verizon’s chief counsel, Randal Milch is now asking President Obama to step in. He wants a blanket statement from the President making clear that he would not allow any decision blocking imports of consumer wireless devices. He would rather see the parties enter into a license agreement.

The real question is if the President has the authority? It happens to be one peculiarity of the ITC that allows rulings to be waived by the President.

Unfortunately Verizon’s perspective is to provide new phones and tablets, and the blocking of imports hinders that. They want everything to be settled with licensing fees, but that is not the solution either. Licensing fees add to the costs and slows innovation. The real problem is the patent system. Patents are given out for just about anything, and the entire system needs to be overhauled.

Ultimately Milch’s request is a start. It could help burst the patent bubble so we can get back to pure innovation.

[via wsj]

Samsung says 9 out of 10 Apple complaints were rejected and it won’t affect sales in other European markets

by Robert Nazarian on
tagged , , , , , , , ,

Earlier today we reported that a Netherlands Judge ruled that Samsung infringed Apple patent EP 2,058,868, and therefore banned the sale of the Galaxy S, Galaxy S II, and the Galaxy Ace.

Samsung made the following statement afterwards:

“Today’s ruling is an affirmation that the Galaxy range of products is innovative and distinctive. With regard to the single infringement cited in the ruling, we will take all possible measures including legal action to ensure that there is no disruption in the availability of our Galaxy smartphones to Dutch consumers.

“This ruling is not expected to affect sales in other European markets”

Later they made a second statement pointing out that the judge rejected 9 out of the 10 complaints Apple made against the Galaxy line (including tablets):

» Read the rest

Patent protection advocate asks for help in the investigation of Apple and Microsoft’s purchase of the Nortel patents

by Robert Nazarian on
tagged , , , , , , , ,

A few weeks ago we reported that the Department of Justice (DOJ) was going to investigate the pending sale of over 6,000 Nortel patents to a consortium led by Apple and Microsoft. If approved, the deal would be completed sometime during this quarter.

Keith Bergelt, CEO of the Open Invention Network is asking for help. He wants developers and users to step up to the plate and share their views with the DOJ with the hopes that the sale will be denied or altered. The Open Invention Network was formed in 2005 to promote Linux by using patents to create a collaborative environment. These patents are available royalty-free to any company, and is currently backed by IBM, NEC, Novell, Philips, Red Hat and Sony.

» Read the rest

Apple asks Dutch court to stop all sales of Samsung Galaxy branded phones and tablets for all of Europe

by Robert Nazarian on
tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Last week we reported that Apple and Samsung had it out in a Dutch court. Apparently Apple is asking the court to stop Samsung from selling ALL Galaxy branded phones and tablets in Europe. They even asked them to recall units that are already in stores.

In case you are not up to speed, a German court gave Apple a preliminary injunction on the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 for all of Europe, except the Netherlands. Samsung was never given a chance to argue, but they will on  August 25th. For now, the same German court reversed the injunction for all of Europe except Germany.

The case in Germany only involved community design which basically means that the Galaxy Tab 10.1 looks similar to the iPad. The Dutch court battlefield is different because Apple finally brought patent infringements into the mix.

» Read the rest

Google Motorola deal has a reverse breakup fee of a whopping $2.5 billion, Why so high?

by Robert Nazarian on
tagged , , , , , ,

Unless you have been under a rock for the last 24 hours you already know about the bomb that Google dropped yesterday acquiring Motorola. We continue to get more information, and something to note is that if the deal fails to close, Google will have to pay Motorola $2.5 billion which is more than six times the typical amount.

If you look at it on a percentage basis, the fee is more than triple the $3 billion AT&T is offering T-Mobile if that deals falls through. Google’s fee is about 26% of the transaction. The median percentage is 3.8% for all deals announced since January 1, 2010. The AT&T/T-Mobile deal is 7.7%.

» Read the rest

If Google is a crybaby then Apple is a coward for trying to take advantage of a broken system

by Robert Nazarian on
tagged , , , , , , ,

What happens to cowards? They get slaughtered, and that is what Google did to Apple today when they announced their acquisition of Motorola. Before today the media was declaring Google a crybaby because they complained that Apple and Microsoft overpaid for the Nortel patents in an attempt to slow down Android with the courts rather than with innovation.

Apple and Microsoft did not “beat” out Google for the Nortel patents, they simply overpaid. Companies like Google, Microsoft, and Apple don’t “lose” deals like this. Each one of these companies has the money to buy whatever they want, but of course they set their own limit of what they are willing to pay. It is no different than the Yankees and Red Sox when they bid on a high priced free agent. A limit is set, and if the other team wants the player more, they will get the player. Sometimes both bidders are close, and someone loses by a small margin, but in this case there is no indication that Google’s final bid was that close. The fact of the matter is Google wasn’t interested in paying four times the value of those patents just to be a patent troll.

» Read the rest

Apple could have tampered with evidence in the German Apple v. Samsung case

by Robert Nazarian on
tagged , , , , , , ,

Last week in Germany, Apple was successful in getting a preliminary injunction on the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 for most of Europe, excluding the Netherlands. Samsung wasn’t able to defend themselves and the injunction was granted based on community design (the products look similar). Samsung gets their chance to defend themselves on August 25th.

I am not going to come out and say Apple tampered with evidence, but there is an interesting development that needs to be noted.

A Dutch website called Webwereld compared images (above) of the court documents and found that the Samsung Galaxy 10.1 was shown as having an aspect ratio of 1:36. It actually has an aspect of 1:46, while the iPad is 1:30. You will also notice that the Samsung logo was removed and the image is of the app drawer and not the normal homescreen.

I am no fan of Apple, but I find it hard to believe they would attempt to do this. Forget the pictures, I am sure the physical devices were (or will be) presented to the court. There is no way Apple could alter the physical devices. I just don’t think that Apple could be that naive to think that Samsung would not catch this. Trust me when I say that I hope I am wrong.

[via androidcentral]

Samsung vs Apple in the Netherlands will be decided on September 15th

by Robert Nazarian on
tagged , , , , , , ,

We already reported that Apple succeeded in getting the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 blocked from most of Europe. The exception was the Netherlands, and the proceedings came to a close today. Apple presented market research that 80% of respondents felt that the iPad and Galaxy Tab 10.1 were “identical” or at least “similar in general impression.” Apple also alleged infringement from the Galaxy S and Galaxy Ace. Samsung argued that Apple’s arguments were so vague that any digital photo frame would be an infringement.

The judge seemed amused at the arguments and called the legal representatives “terriers.” He finished by saying a ruling would come down on September 15th, and if an injunction were to come, it would be October 13th. If you are in the Netherlands and you are thinking about getting a Galaxy Tab 10.1, you have at least 63 days to save up your money.

[via engadget]