Quote:
Originally Posted by os2baba
As far as I'm concerned, no physical keyboard - No sale.
|
Yeah, I hate touchscreen-only devices, and so far, that seems to be the options we have.
I currently have a touchscreen-only Motorola and it's awful. I need to be motionless, use two hands and full concentration to type on it, and it's inaccurate and extremely slow. It's a major step backwards from the good old interface called "buttons". It's also a safety issue. In a stressful situation, how long would it take me to dial 911 on the thing? I was riding along in a car as a passenger, on a freeway that was slightly bumpy, and that's all it took for the Motorola's handwriting recognition to shift from being "slow and inaccurate" to being "non-usable". That sucks. Mobile phones of 20 years ago at least were usable while in a moving vehicle.
It's an awful design idea.
Despite all the other wonderful things cellphones do today, the fundamental use of them is making phone calls. Old style phones (the kind with buttons) could do that very easily: dial the number and press "call". On my Motorola, I need to get out the stylus, navigate over to the "dial" screen, and clumsily dial my number in (usually making mistakes). It's insane. The second fundamental use of a cellphone today is in sending SMS, and again, it's a major chore without real buttons. Anyone with any kind keyboard (numeric or qwerty) can out-type anyone on a touchscreen.
Clamshell phones with keyboards may be old-fashioned but they are still ahead of all other designs because you open the phone, dial, and hit "call". Candybar phones still require an unlock key and have a tendency to dial in your pocket or bag. The iPhone requires some unlock screen drag, and probably should be carried in a case to prevent scratches.
The clamshell with a keyboard is what's most functional. It doesn't look as good but it's most functional, and it annoys me that no one is making an Android phone in this form factor. How hard could it be?