The verdict is in. Google did not breach Oracle patents.

Not Guilty. Finally the two words that Android fans worldwide were waiting to hear have been uttered, bringing and end to lengthy court case . After a week long deliberation the jury in California ruled in favour of Google declaring that the search giant did not infringe on Oracle’s patents with Android. Earlier this month we brought you the news that the jury had concluded that Google had infringed on 37 separate API’s. The jury has since concluded that Google adequately demonstrated that it felt it was acting within the law due to its belief that it didn’t need a license to utilise java,

The news represents a significant victory for Google who would have been set to pay damages of up to $1bn should it have been found guilty. Naturally, both firms have released statements post verdict.

Oracle:

Oracle presented overwhelming evidence at trial that Google knew it would fragment and damage Java. We plan to continue to defend and uphold Java’s core write once run anywhere principle and ensure it is protected for the nine million Java developers and the community that depend on Java compatibility.

Google:

Today’s jury verdict that Android does not infringe Oracle’s patents was a victory not just for Google but the entire Android ecosystem.

So another law suit bites the dust; Google and Android live to fight another day. Do you think we’ve heard the last of it or will Oracle by ready to launch an appeal? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Source: Verdict

» See more articles by Chris Stewart


Google+5Facebook0Twitter67
  • Lawrence D’Oliveiro

    Dear Larry:

    My condolences.

    – sent from my Android phone

  • Duncan Booth

    I thought Google was charged with violating specific patents which didn’t even mention Java? So why did Oracle waste everyone’s time presenting “overwhelming evidence at trial that Google knew it would fragment and damage Java”.Having followed the wonderful Groklaw coverage the only amazing thing about this case was that the rest of the Jury didn’t sit on the foreman sooner.

  • Duncan Booth

    I thought Google was charged with violating specific patents which didn’t even mention Java? So why did Oracle waste everyone’s time presenting “overwhelming evidence at trial that Google knew it would fragment and damage Java”.Having followed the wonderful Groklaw coverage the only amazing thing about this case was that the rest of the Jury didn’t sit on the foreman sooner.